2003 Lancia Thesis vs. 1963 NSU 1000 C
To start off, 2003 Lancia Thesis is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 2,386 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Lancia Thesis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lancia Thesis (148 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lancia Thesis should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lancia Thesis weights approximately 1150 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 NSU 1000 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 NSU 1000 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lancia Thesis, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lancia Thesis (305 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 236 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (69 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Lancia Thesis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 C.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lancia Thesis | 1963 NSU 1000 C | |
Make | Lancia | NSU |
Model | Thesis | 1000 C |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2386 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 39 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 66.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 19.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 44 L |