2003 Lancia Zeta vs. 1978 Volvo 264
To start off, 2003 Lancia Zeta is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 264. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 264 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 264 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 264 (148 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2003 Lancia Zeta. (134 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 264 should accelerate faster than 2003 Lancia Zeta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 146 kg more than 1978 Volvo 264.
Because 1978 Volvo 264 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 264. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1978 Volvo 264 (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Lancia Zeta. (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1978 Volvo 264 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Lancia Zeta.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lancia Zeta | 1978 Volvo 264 | |
Make | Lancia | Volvo |
Model | Zeta | 264 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1602 kg | 1456 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4480 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |