2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1955 Packard Carribean
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Packard Carribean. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Packard Carribean would be higher. At 5,767 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Packard Carribean is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1955 Packard Carribean. (257 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1955 Packard Carribean.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Packard Carribean. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | 1955 Packard Carribean | |
| Make | Land Rover | Packard |
| Model | Range Rover | Carribean |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1955 |
| Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4396 cc | 5767 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 257 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3240 mm |
