2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1956 Renault Juva
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Renault Juva would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1770 kg more than 1956 Renault Juva.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1956 Renault Juva. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1956 Renault Juva has manual transmission. 1956 Renault Juva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | 1956 Renault Juva | |
| Make | Land Rover | Renault |
| Model | Range Rover | Juva |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1956 |
| Engine Size | 4396 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2360 mm |
