2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1958 Opel Rekord
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1555 kg more than 1958 Opel Rekord.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Opel Rekord. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | 1958 Opel Rekord | |
| Make | Land Rover | Opel |
| Model | Range Rover | Rekord |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4396 cc | 1680 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1620 mm |
