2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1963 Seat 1500
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Seat 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Seat 1500 would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1963 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1963 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1355 kg more than 1963 Seat 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Seat 1500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Land Rover Range Rover | 1963 Seat 1500 | |
Make | Land Rover | Seat |
Model | Range Rover | 1500 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4396 cc | 1481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2660 mm |