2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1965 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Zastava 850 K. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Zastava 850 K would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1660 kg more than 1965 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Land Rover Range Rover | 1965 Zastava 850 K | |
Make | Land Rover | Zastava |
Model | Range Rover | 850 K |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 4396 cc | 846 cc |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |