2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1968 TVR Vixen
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 TVR Vixen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 TVR Vixen would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 207 more horse power than 1968 TVR Vixen. (75 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1968 TVR Vixen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1755 kg more than 1968 TVR Vixen. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm) has 315 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 TVR Vixen. (125 Nm). This means 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 TVR Vixen.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Land Rover Range Rover | 1968 TVR Vixen | |
Make | Land Rover | TVR |
Model | Range Rover | Vixen |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4396 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 125 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 77.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 65 L |