2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1971 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1971 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1971 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1270 kg more than 1971 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 304 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 Triumph 2000. (136 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Land Rover Range Rover | 1971 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Land Rover | Triumph |
Model | Range Rover | 2000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1971 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4396 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |