2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 1995 Nissan AA-X
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Nissan AA-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Nissan AA-X would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1255 kg more than 1995 Nissan AA-X.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Nissan AA-X. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1995 Nissan AA-X has manual transmission. 1995 Nissan AA-X will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | 1995 Nissan AA-X | |
| Make | Land Rover | Nissan |
| Model | Range Rover | AA-X |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4396 cc | 1273 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 1260 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2530 mm |
