2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2000 Lotus Elise
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Lotus Elise. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Lotus Elise would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 2000 Lotus Elise. (143 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2000 Lotus Elise. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1795 kg more than 2000 Lotus Elise. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lotus Elise. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Lotus Elise. (174 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Lotus Elise. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2000 Lotus Elise has manual transmission. 2000 Lotus Elise will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Land Rover Range Rover | 2000 Lotus Elise | |
Make | Land Rover | Lotus |
Model | Range Rover | Elise |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 4396 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 89.3 mm |
Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 214 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 720 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 36 L |