2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2000 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Toyota Corona. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | 2000 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Land Rover | Toyota |
| Model | Range Rover | Corona |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4396 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
