2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 208 more horse power than 2006 Renault Clio. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1530 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 335 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Clio. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2006 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2006 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Land Rover Range Rover | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Land Rover | Renault |
Model | Range Rover | Clio |
Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4396 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 440 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 76.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 208 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.1 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 50 L |