2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2008 Subaru Forester

To start off, 2008 Subaru Forester is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1090 kg more than 2008 Subaru Forester.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Subaru Forester. (320 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Subaru Forester.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Land Rover Range Rover 2008 Subaru Forester
Make Land Rover Subaru
Model Range Rover Forester
Year Released 2003 2008
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4396 cc 2457 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line boxer
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 282 HP 0 HP
Torque 440 Nm 320 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Top Speed 208 km/hour 205 km/hour
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2515 kg 1425 kg
Vehicle Length 4960 mm 4490 mm
Vehicle Width 2200 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1870 mm 1590 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2530 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 18.1 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 100 L 60 L