2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2009 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2009 Saturn Outlook is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2009 Saturn Outlook. (277 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2009 Saturn Outlook.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Saturn Outlook. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Saturn Outlook. (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Saturn Outlook.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | 2009 Saturn Outlook | |
| Make | Land Rover | Saturn |
| Model | Range Rover | Outlook |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4396 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 277 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 253 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1990 mm |
