2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 139 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Land Rover | Ford |
| Model | Range Rover | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4396 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2490 mm |
