2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 25 kg more than 2003 Land Rover Range Rover.
Because 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Land Rover | Fisker |
| Model | Range Rover | Karma |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 282 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2515 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2200 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 36 L |
