2003 Lexus ES vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2003 Lexus ES is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 2,995 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Lexus ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lexus ES (208 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lexus ES should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lexus ES weights approximately 650 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lexus ES (298 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Lexus ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lexus ES | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Lexus | Mitsubishi |
Model | ES | Colt |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2995 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2360 mm |