2003 Lincoln LS vs. 1959 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2003 Lincoln LS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,934 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lincoln LS (276 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1959 Lotus Seven. (74 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1959 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lincoln LS weights approximately 1290 kg more than 1959 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lincoln LS | 1959 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Lincoln | Lotus |
Model | LS | Seven |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3934 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1710 kg | 420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1350 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2240 mm |