2003 Lincoln LS vs. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2003 Lincoln LS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lincoln LS weights approximately 365 kg more than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 2003 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Lincoln LS | 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Lincoln | Oldsmobile |
| Model | LS | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 229 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1685 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2680 mm |
