2003 Lincoln LS vs. 1987 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Lincoln LS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lincoln LS (229 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1987 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Ranger.
Because 1987 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Lincoln LS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lincoln LS | 1987 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Lincoln | Ford |
Model | LS | Ranger |
Year Released | 2003 | 1987 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1810 mm |