2003 Lincoln LS vs. 2010 Peugeot 207
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 207 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lincoln LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lincoln LS would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lincoln LS (229 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 207. (121 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 207.
Because 2003 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 207, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Lincoln LS has automatic transmission and 2010 Peugeot 207 has manual transmission. 2010 Peugeot 207 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Lincoln LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lincoln LS | 2010 Peugeot 207 | |
Make | Lincoln | Peugeot |
Model | LS | 207 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2967 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 229 HP | 121 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4930 mm | 4044 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1972 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1397 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |