2003 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1967 ZAZ 966
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 ZAZ 966. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 ZAZ 966 would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 816 more horse power than 1967 ZAZ 966. (27 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1967 ZAZ 966. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lotec C 1000 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1967 ZAZ 966. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 938 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 ZAZ 966. (52 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 ZAZ 966.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lotec C 1000 | 1967 ZAZ 966 | |
Make | Lotec | ZAZ |
Model | C 1000 | 966 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Size | 5499 cc | 886 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1380 mm |