2003 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1983 Volvo 760
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Volvo 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Volvo 760 would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 687 more horse power than 1983 Volvo 760. (156 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1983 Volvo 760. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Volvo 760 weights approximately 245 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 756 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Volvo 760. (234 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Volvo 760.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lotec C 1000 | 1983 Volvo 760 | |
Make | Lotec | Volvo |
Model | C 1000 | 760 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5499 cc | 2849 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 234 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1420 mm |