2003 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP) has 790 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Lotec C 1000 weights approximately 430 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lotec C 1000 | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Lotec | MCC |
Model | C 1000 | Smart |
Year Released | 2003 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Middle | Rear |
Engine Size | 5499 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 53 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1460 mm |