2003 Lotec C 1000 vs. 1999 Lotec C 1000
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 843 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 990 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Lotec C 1000 | 1999 Lotec C 1000 | |
| Make | Lotec | Lotec |
| Model | C 1000 | C 1000 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
| Engine Size | 5499 cc | 5498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 843 HP | 843 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 990 Nm | 990 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1150 mm |
