2003 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2002 MG TF
To start off, 2003 Lotec C 1000 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MG TF. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MG TF would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 729 more horse power than 2002 MG TF. (114 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2002 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 MG TF weights approximately 20 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 845 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MG TF. (145 Nm @ 4700 RPM). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lotec C 1000 | 2002 MG TF | |
Make | Lotec | MG |
Model | C 1000 | TF |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 5499 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1270 mm |