2003 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2004 Volvo C70
To start off, 2004 Volvo C70 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 653 more horse power than 2004 Volvo C70. (190 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2004 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo C70 weights approximately 485 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Because 2003 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm) has 705 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volvo C70. (285 Nm). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Lotec C 1000 | 2004 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Lotec | Volvo |
| Model | C 1000 | C70 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5499 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 843 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 990 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1565 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1440 mm |
