2003 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2006 MG ZT
To start off, 2006 MG ZT is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 587 more horse power than 2006 MG ZT. (256 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2006 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 MG ZT weights approximately 480 kg more than 2003 Lotec C 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 580 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG ZT. (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Lotec C 1000 | 2006 MG ZT | |
| Make | Lotec | MG |
| Model | C 1000 | ZT |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5499 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 843 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 990 Nm | 410 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4750 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1420 mm |
