2003 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2010 Ford F-450
To start off, 2010 Ford F-450 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-450 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 517 more horse power than 2010 Ford F-450. (326 HP @ 3000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford F-450.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 176 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford F-450. (814 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford F-450.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lotec C 1000 | 2010 Ford F-450 | |
Make | Lotec | Ford |
Model | C 1000 | F-450 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5499 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 326 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 814 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 6670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 2030 mm |