2003 Lotec C 1000 vs. 2012 Renault Megane
To start off, 2012 Renault Megane is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Lotec C 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Lotec C 1000 would be higher. At 5,499 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Lotec C 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (843 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 731 more horse power than 2012 Renault Megane. (112 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Lotec C 1000 should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Megane.
Because 2003 Lotec C 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Lotec C 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Lotec C 1000 (990 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 838 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Megane. (152 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2003 Lotec C 1000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lotec C 1000 | 2012 Renault Megane | |
Make | Lotec | Renault |
Model | C 1000 | Megane |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5499 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 843 HP | 112 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 990 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1150 mm | 1470 mm |