2003 Lotus Elise vs. 1986 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2003 Lotus Elise is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,513 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mercury Sable weights approximately 650 kg more than 2003 Lotus Elise.
Because 2003 Lotus Elise is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Lotus Elise. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Lotus Elise | 1986 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Lotus | Mercury |
Model | Elise | Sable |
Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 2513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 121 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2700 mm |