2003 Mahindra Armada vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2003 Mahindra Armada is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Toyota Celica (119 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 824 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mahindra Armada | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
| Model | Armada | Celica |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 4610 mm |
