2003 Mahindra Armada vs. 2012 Lada Niva
To start off, 2012 Lada Niva is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mahindra Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mahindra Armada would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Lada Niva (81 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Lada Niva should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 719 kg more than 2012 Lada Niva.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mahindra Armada | 2012 Lada Niva | |
| Make | Mahindra | Lada |
| Model | Armada | Niva |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1690 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2004 kg | 1285 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4310 mm | 3730 mm |
