2003 Mahindra Bolero vs. 1967 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2003 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mercury Comet (118 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. (72 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 35 kg more than 1967 Mercury Comet.
Because 2003 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Mercury Comet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mercury Comet (258 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. (156 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1967 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mahindra Bolero.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mahindra Bolero | 1967 Mercury Comet | |
| Make | Mahindra | Mercury |
| Model | Bolero | Comet |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1967 |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 3279 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 156 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1660 kg |
