2003 Mahindra Bolero vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2003 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mahindra Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (74 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. (72 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 85 kg more than 2000 Toyota Celica.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (622 Nm) has 466 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. (156 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mahindra Bolero.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mahindra Bolero | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Mahindra | Toyota |
Model | Bolero | Celica |
Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 156 Nm | 622 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 1610 kg |