2003 Mahindra Bolero vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2003 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mahindra Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mahindra Bolero (72 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Bolero should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 955 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mahindra Bolero (156 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2003 Mahindra Bolero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mahindra Bolero | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Mahindra | MCC |
Model | Bolero | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2003 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 156 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1695 kg | 740 kg |