2003 Mahindra Bolero vs. 2010 Mazda 3

To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mahindra Bolero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mahindra Bolero would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mahindra Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. (72 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 395 kg more than 2010 Mazda 3.

Because 2003 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. (156 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mahindra Bolero. 2010 Mazda 3 has automatic transmission and 2003 Mahindra Bolero has manual transmission. 2003 Mahindra Bolero will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: