2003 Mahindra CL vs. 1965 AC Cobra
To start off, 2003 Mahindra CL is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,737 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 AC Cobra (267 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra CL weights approximately 292 kg more than 1965 AC Cobra.
Because 2003 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 AC Cobra (426 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1965 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mahindra CL | 1965 AC Cobra | |
Make | Mahindra | AC |
Model | CL | Cobra |
Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2523 cc | 4737 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 267 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 426 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2290 mm |