2003 Mahindra CL vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 2003 Mahindra CL is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra CL. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2.5 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra CL. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra CL weights approximately 169 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Because 2003 Mahindra CL is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Triumph 2.5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra CL will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (222 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mahindra CL. (165 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mahindra CL.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Mahindra CL | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
| Make | Mahindra | Triumph |
| Model | CL | 2.5 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2523 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 222 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1302 kg | 1133 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3360 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1460 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2700 mm |
