2003 Maserati Kubang vs. 2010 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Maserati Kubang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Maserati Kubang would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (510 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 2003 Maserati Kubang. (385 HP @ 7000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2003 Maserati Kubang.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Land Rover Range Rover (624 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Maserati Kubang. (461 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Maserati Kubang.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Maserati Kubang | 2010 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Maserati | Land Rover |
| Model | Kubang | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 4244 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 385 HP | 510 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 461 Nm | 624 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4973 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 2035 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1877 mm |
