2003 Mazda 2 vs. 1959 Sunbeam Rapier
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Sunbeam Rapier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Sunbeam Rapier would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 2 (81 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1959 Sunbeam Rapier. (77 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1959 Sunbeam Rapier.
Because 1959 Sunbeam Rapier is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Sunbeam Rapier. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 2 | 1959 Sunbeam Rapier | |
Make | Mazda | Sunbeam |
Model | 2 | Rapier |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 77 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2440 mm |