2003 Mazda 2 vs. 1965 MG MGB

To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG MGB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG MGB would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 MG MGB is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 MG MGB (89 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 MG MGB should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 2 weights approximately 174 kg more than 1965 MG MGB.

Because 1965 MG MGB is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 MG MGB. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 MG MGB (149 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 2. (141 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1965 MG MGB will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 2.

Compare all specifications:

2003 Mazda 2 1965 MG MGB
Make Mazda MG
Model 2 MGB
Year Released 2003 1965
Body Type Hatchback Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1498 cc 1798 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 81 HP 89 HP
Torque 141 Nm 149 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1080 kg 906 kg
Vehicle Length 3930 mm 3900 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1530 mm
Vehicle Height 1550 mm 1260 mm
Wheelbase Size 2500 mm 2320 mm