2003 Mazda 2 vs. 1970 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Triumph 2000 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 160 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 2 (168 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 2 | 1970 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Mazda | Triumph |
Model | 2 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1397 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 168 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1245 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2700 mm |