2003 Mazda 2 vs. 1975 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Plymouth Valiant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Plymouth Valiant would be higher. At 3,689 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1975 Plymouth Valiant is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Plymouth Valiant. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 2 | 1975 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Mazda | Plymouth |
Model | 2 | Valiant |
Year Released | 2003 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 3689 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2830 mm |