2003 Mazda 2 vs. 1978 Zastava 750

To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 2 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1978 Zastava 750. (30 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1978 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 2 weights approximately 438 kg more than 1978 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 2 (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Zastava 750. (51 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications: