2003 Mazda 2 vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 2003 Mazda 2 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. Both 2003 Mazda 2 and 1983 Mercury Lynx are equipped with a 1,598 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 2 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (83 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 2 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1983 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 2 (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (122 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 2 | 1983 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Mazda | Mercury |
Model | 2 | Lynx |
Year Released | 2003 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2400 mm |