2003 Mazda 2 vs. 2004 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2004 Renault Scenic is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 2 (79 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Renault Scenic. (74 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 2004 Renault Scenic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Scenic weights approximately 654 kg more than 2003 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 2 (128 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Renault Scenic. (105 Nm). This means 2003 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Renault Scenic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 2 | 2004 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 2 | Scenic |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1704 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 48 L |