2003 Mazda 2 vs. 2010 Fiat Doblo
To start off, 2010 Fiat Doblo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mazda 2 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2010 Fiat Doblo. (102 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 2010 Fiat Doblo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 2 (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Fiat Doblo. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Fiat Doblo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 2 | 2010 Fiat Doblo | |
Make | Mazda | Fiat |
Model | 2 | Doblo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.4 mm | 78.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2570 mm |