2003 Mazda 2 vs. 2012 Renault Megane
To start off, 2012 Renault Megane is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 2. (79 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 2.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 2. (128 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Mazda 2 | 2012 Renault Megane | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 2 | Megane |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1388 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 93 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3930 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |